By David Barwick – FRANKFURT (Econostream) – The European Central Bank’s latest SAFE survey, just released, does not compel a rate hike on Thursday but does make a relaxed hold harder to justify.
The survey strengthens the case for a cautious, hawkish hold rather than a preemptive hike. Firms are clearly seeing more pressure from financing costs, input costs and near-term inflation expectations. But the results do not show the broader second-round pass-through that would speak for immediate tightening.
The uncomfortable part of the survey includes selling-price expectations over the next 12 months, which rose to 3.5% from 2.9%, while expected non-labor input cost increases, including energy, jumped to 5.8% from 3.6%. One-year inflation expectations rose to 3.0% from 2.6%, and the share of firms seeing upside risks to five-year inflation expectations increased to 65% from 56%.
The Governing Council cannot dismiss such signals under the current circumstances; the survey thus adds to the case for vigilance.
Of course, the survey cannot be expected to offer a fully mature take on the shock’s impact. It only captured developments up to April 1, meaning a significant part of the response period either preceded the war or came before firms had much chance to assess its consequences. SAFE therefore cannot settle whether these pressures will broaden into wages, margins and medium-term expectations.
In any event, vigilance is not quite urgency. Wage expectations moderated, to 2.8% from 3.1%, while median inflation expectations at the three- and five-year horizons remained stable at 3.0%. SAFE raises the warning level without showing that cost pressure has broadened into wage-setting or persistent medium-term price dynamics.
The financing side of the survey also cuts against the case for a hasty hike. A net 26% of firms reported higher bank loan rates, up from 12% in the previous quarter. Other financing costs also rose, while bank loan availability deteriorated slightly. Financing needs were stable, and the bank loan financing gap remained positive but edged down.
In other words, monetary and financial conditions are already tightening at the firm level. That does not rule out further ECB action if inflation persistence requires it, but argues against treating an April hike as the obvious response to a supply shock whose second-round effects are still uncertain.
The policy message is on balance not dovish. SAFE gives ECB President Christine Lagarde ample basis to say that upside risks have intensified, that firms are reporting stronger cost and selling-price expectations, and that the Governing Council must remain ready to respond if those pressures become more durable.
But it also gives her reason to avoid what one might call shooting from the hip. The wage and medium-term expectations components are precisely where one would expect clearer evidence if the shock were already becoming self-reinforcing. Their relative stability supports waiting for the remaining data, including inflation, growth and the ECB’s corporate telephone survey.
The April decision can still be framed as a hold under heightened alert, not as a return to comfort. SAFE forbids any complacency on Thursday, but does not compel acting before the transmission and persistence of the shock are better understood.




